Are the graphs now correct (https://gna.org/bugs/?22212)? These commits should avoid a lot of changes in the rest of specific_analyses.relax_disp to handle the back_calc numpy array structure. Cheers, Edward On 18 June 2014 09:25, <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Author: tlinnet Date: Wed Jun 18 09:25:48 2014 New Revision: 24063 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=24063&view=rev Log: Used the new class function: get_back_calc(), to get the data in the right structures when interpolating for graphs. Task #7807 (https://gna.org/task/index.php?7807): Speed-up of dispersion models for Clustered analysis. Modified: branches/disp_spin_speed/specific_analyses/relax_disp/optimisation.py Modified: branches/disp_spin_speed/specific_analyses/relax_disp/optimisation.py URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/disp_spin_speed/specific_analyses/relax_disp/optimisation.py?rev=24063&r1=24062&r2=24063&view=diff ============================================================================== --- branches/disp_spin_speed/specific_analyses/relax_disp/optimisation.py (original) +++ branches/disp_spin_speed/specific_analyses/relax_disp/optimisation.py Wed Jun 18 09:25:48 2014 @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ spin.chi2 = chi2 # Return the structure. - return model.back_calc + return model.get_back_calc() def calculate_r2eff(): _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-commits mailing list relax-commits@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits