Hi, I have thought of this, but decided against it. The reasons were: - Minfx and bmrblib are bundled with relax, so most relax users will never need it. - It's easy enough to run 'python setup.py install' when needed. This also has more flexibility when you have multiple Python installations, for example if you install your own Python as a user. - It was better to keep these packages 'quite'. The last point was the most important. Accepting new developers and performing code reviews and project management is a big effort! And these two packages work just fine with relax, and are tested in the relax test suite, so I saw no benefit in widely advertising these. Minfx was written back when my coding skills were not so advanced, so there could be a lot of clean ups, code refactorisations, and speed ups performed. And bmrblib could very, very easily be expanded to cover the whole of the BMRB database definitions (if you look at the code, I had started an automated way to do this from the BMRB docs). However as neither package have their own test suites, this infrastructure would have to be added first. If a developer were to come along and be interested in advancing https://gna.org/projects/minfx/ or https://gna.org/projects/bmrblib/, accepted the challenge of adding the required test suite infrastructure, and taking on the task of being the release manager, then they could add these to PyPI. But because I wanted less work, I decided against PyPI at the time. Regards, Edward On 20 October 2014 13:10, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Edward. I wondered why for example minfx and bmrblib is not released to PyPI? http://peterdowns.com/posts/first-time-with-pypi.html Best Troels _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel