On 15 June 2015 at 15:28, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Edward. What do you think about this bug report? I added some figures, showing that the parameter values does not represent the expectation value of the Monte-Carlo simulation distribution.
Did you see my response at ... Oh, it was not reply-to-all and it went to the <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> email address only! My email from 3 hours ago was: """ This is actually the definition of Monte Carlo simulations. The parameter value is the optimised value and the parameter error is the standard deviation of the back-calculated distribution. There are two opposite and very much related values which do not have a great statistical meaning. That is the mean of the back-calculated distribution and the standard deviation of the non-back-calculated distribution. These are unused for good reason. You can create the non-back-calculated distribution by using the bootstrapping in relax - the mean of this will equal the optimised parameter value, but the standard deviation will not match the MC standard deviation. I suggest looking at the Numerical Recipes books as they have a great diagram of the Monte Carlo simulation setup and how the parameter value and error are calculated. """ Regards, Edward