Hi Ed,
Ok, the change is made (r8143).
However, it is done in the same way for the intensity_generic() function
as for other intensity_*() functions... I am not sure to understand why
you propose to do it differently in the intensity_generic() function...
As for now, it seems to work fine.
Regards,
Séb :)
Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Sébastien Morin
<sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ed,
I am not sure I understand all what you say here...
Am I right if I say that you propose to return the spin_id directly from
the intensity_*() functions ? This would simplify the code. Perfect.
That's what I meant.
What about not doing so for the intensity_generic function also ? What
difference would this make ? This is where I don't follow what you
say... That function is not already returning the spin_id, right ?
Ah, the intensity_generic() function also needs to do this! But it
should generate it differently - directly from the generic peak
intensity file. Hope that clears things up.
Regards,
Edward
Re: r8127 - /1.3/generic_fns/spectrum.py