There is one technical problem that is not really solvable without a
lot of code rearrangment. That is that the Grace code is split into
two - one function to generate the head which contains the information
required for determining if autoscaling should be turned on and one
function to format the graph data. I never knew that @ commands could
be added to the end of a Grace file.
Maybe it would be better if the code was written to calculate the min,
max, major tick marks, and minor tick marks properly. That way
autoscale would not be needed. The error you see about too many tick
marks is because the min and max are set, but not the tick mark
placement.
Actually, I have just grepped the relax source code and found there
are really not many places where the axis minimum and maximum values
are set. This is only used for the residue numbering. Therefore
maybe I could just eliminate these arguments and place a simple
'@autoscale' at the end of each graph and be done with it!
Cheers,
Edward
On 11 June 2013 15:39, Troels E. Linnet
<NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Additional Item Attachment, bug #20888 (project relax):
File name: chi2_autoscale_xyaxes.agr Size:5 KB
File name: chi2_NO_autoscale.agr Size:4 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?20888>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
Re: [bug #20888] @autoscale command missing in grace files