Hi,
Does this GUI test not pass on your system? Or have you modified the
test and it now no longer works?
Cheers,
Edward
On 23 April 2014 12:46, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Edward.
>
> I see some errors:
>
> The key 'relax_disp.cpmg_frq' does not exist.
>
> it is from this block.
>
> if status.relax_mode != 'gui' and wx.version() != '2.9.4.1 gtk2
> (classic)':
> analysis.peak_intensity.action_relax_disp_cpmg_frq(item=4)
> uf_store['relax_disp.cpmg_frq'].wizard._go_next()
> interpreter.flush()
> analysis.peak_intensity.action_relax_disp_exp_type(item=5)
> uf_store['relax_disp.exp_type'].wizard._go_next()
> interpreter.flush()
> analysis.peak_intensity.action_relax_disp_relax_time(item=0)
> uf_store['relax_disp.relax_time'].wizard._go_next()
> interpreter.flush()
> analysis.peak_intensity.action_spectrometer_frq(item=10)
> uf_store['spectrometer.frequency'].wizard._go_next()
> interpreter.flush()
>
>
> Best
> Troels
>
>
> 2014-04-23 11:29 GMT+02:00 Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Awesome! That's exactly the change I would have made.
>>
>> I would also suggest to try to increase the system test coverage of
>> this to make sure it works in all cases, as well as to make sure that
>> any future code refactorisation or expansion doesn't break this. The
>> easiest way is to simply add more checks to an already existing test.
>> But the only one possible is the Relax_disp.test_hansen_trunc_data GUI
>> test as I mentioned at
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/5302/focus=5307.
>> Would you like to add a couple of self.assertEqual() checks to that
>> test, just after the peak height error analysis, to make sure that the
>> code works when variance averaging over different SD values is
>> preformed? Such checks would really make the code robust to future
>> changes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Edward
>>
>>
>> On 23 April 2014 10:37, <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Author: tlinnet
>> > Date: Wed Apr 23 10:37:58 2014
>> > New Revision: 22835
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=22835&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > Fix for bug. The variances used to calculated std, should only be taken
>> > from those which are defined in the subset.
>> >
>> > Regarding bug #21954, (https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?21954) - Order of
>> > spectrum.error_analysis is important.
>> >
>> > Modified:
>> > trunk/pipe_control/spectrum.py
>> >
>> > Modified: trunk/pipe_control/spectrum.py
>> > URL:
>> > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/pipe_control/spectrum.py?rev=22835&r1=22834&r2=22835&view=diff
>> >
>> > ==============================================================================
>> > --- trunk/pipe_control/spectrum.py (original)
>> > +++ trunk/pipe_control/spectrum.py Wed Apr 23 10:37:58 2014
>> > @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@
>> >
>> > # Loop over all time points.
>> > for id in cdp.var_I.keys():
>> > + # Only use id's defined in subset
>> > + if id not in subset:
>> > + continue
>> > +
>> > # Single spectrum (or extraordinarily accurate NMR
>> > spectra!).
>> > if cdp.var_I[id] == 0.0:
>> > continue
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>> >
>> > This is the relax-commits mailing list
>> > relax-commits@xxxxxxx
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>> > reminder, or change your subscription options,
>> > visit the list information page at
>> > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
>>
>> This is the relax-devel mailing list
>> relax-devel@xxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
>> reminder, or change your subscription options,
>> visit the list information page at
>> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
>
>