Of course, that a good idea. The task is to complain harder with a
RelaxError when R1 data is not loaded and one of the off-resonance
R1rho models are selected (but not for M61 and other on-resonance
models, as we need to support these and the special R1rho-R1
experiment type). But we should get your branch out of the way first.
If you would like to optimise R1, as discussed in link in the first
comment of this task
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/5198), I would
suggest that another task is created, and this feature is developed in
a branch. The missing R1 RelaxError can be developed in trunk, as
this is simple.
Regards,
Edward
On 17 June 2014 20:37, Troels E. Linnet
<NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21788 (project relax):
Hi Ed.
Can we add this feature?
Ideally, I would like to implement fitting of R1.
This could be done, if no R1 data is loaded ?
Best
Troels
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?21788>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel