Author: semor Date: Thu Oct 16 05:02:11 2008 New Revision: 7743 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=7743&view=rev Log: Added more to the XEasy support test. Now, the test fails when reaching the first residue with a non HN/N assignment. In fact, the reading of this residue is fine, but no intensity is extracted... hence the failure of the test. Now, what do we want to do ? Do we want to support side chain assignments mixed with backbone assignments ? In other words, do we want to support multiuple assignment types in a single analysis ? Modified: 1.3/test_suite/system_tests/peak_lists.py Modified: 1.3/test_suite/system_tests/peak_lists.py URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/1.3/test_suite/system_tests/peak_lists.py?rev=7743&r1=7742&r2=7743&view=diff ============================================================================== --- 1.3/test_suite/system_tests/peak_lists.py (original) +++ 1.3/test_suite/system_tests/peak_lists.py Thu Oct 16 05:02:11 2008 @@ -155,3 +155,10 @@ # Test the data. self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[0].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 9.714e+03) self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[1].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 7.919e+03) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[2].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 1.356e+04) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[3].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 9.884e+03) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[4].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 2.041e+04) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[5].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 9.305e+03) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[6].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 3.154e+04) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[7].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 9.180e+03) + self.assertEqual(cdp.mol[0].res[8].spin[0].intensities[0][0], 1.532e+04)