mailr7901 - /branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by edward on October 22, 2008 - 10:41:
Author: bugman
Date: Wed Oct 22 10:41:28 2008
New Revision: 7901

URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=7901&view=rev
Log:
Finished of the massive docstring of the spectrum.error_analysis() user 
function.


Modified:
    branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py

Modified: branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py
URL: 
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py?rev=7901&r1=7900&r2=7901&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py (original)
+++ branches/spectral_errors/prompt/spectrum.py Wed Oct 22 10:41:28 2008
@@ -169,6 +169,62 @@
         these are again averaged to give a single error per replicated 
spectra set.  However as all
         replicated spectra sets will have their own error estimate, variance 
averaging across all
         spectra sets will not be performed.
+
+
+        Peak volumes with baseplane noise RMSD
+        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+        The method of error analysis when no spectra have been replicated 
and peak volumes are used
+        is highly dependent on the integration method.  Many methods simply 
sum the number of points
+        within a fixed region, either a box or oval object.  The number of 
points used, N, must be
+        specified by another user function in this class.  Then the error is 
simply given by the sum
+        of variances:
+
+        -----
+
+            sigma_vol^2 = sigma_i^2 * N,
+
+        -----
+
+        where sigma_vol is the standard deviation of the volume, sigma_i is 
the standard deviation
+        of a single point assumed to be equal to the RMSD of the baseplane 
noise, and N is the total
+        number of points used in the summation integration method.  For a 
box integration method,
+        this converts to the Nicholson, Kay, Baldisseri, Arango, Young, Bax, 
and Torchia (1992)
+        Biochemistry, 31: 5253-5263 equation:
+
+        -----
+
+            sigma_vol = sigma_i * sqrt(n*m),
+
+        -----
+
+        where n and m are the dimensions of the box.  Note that a number of 
programs, for example
+        peakint 
(http://hugin.ethz.ch/wuthrich/software/xeasy/xeasy_m15.html) does not use all
+        points within the box.  And if the number N can not be determined, 
this category of error
+        analysis is not possible.
+
+        Also note that non-point summation methods, for example when line 
shape fitting is used to
+        determine peak volumes, the equations above cannot be used.  Hence 
again this category of
+        error analysis cannot be used.  This is the case for one of the 
three integration methods
+        used by Sparky 
(http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky/manual/peaks.html#Integration).  And
+        if fancy techniques are used, for example as Cara does to 
deconvolute overlapping peaks
+        (http://www.cara.ethz.ch/Wiki/Integration), this again makes this 
error analysis impossible.
+
+
+        Peak volumes with partially replicated spectra
+        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+        When peak volumes are measured by any integration method and a few 
of the spectra are
+        replicated, then the intensity errors are calculated identically as 
described in the 'Peak
+        heights with partially replicated spectra' section above.
+
+
+        Peak volumes with all spectra replicated
+        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+        With all spectra replicated and again using any integration 
methodology, the intensity
+        errors can be calculated as described in the 'Peak heights with all 
spectra replicated'
+        section above.
         """
 
 




Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Wed Oct 22 11:00:02 2008