mailr19905 - /branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by edward on June 06, 2013 - 19:22:
Author: bugman
Date: Thu Jun  6 19:22:23 2013
New Revision: 19905

URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=19905&view=rev
Log:
Fix for the M61 model target function.

The spin-lock fields need to be used, not the CPMG frequencies.


Modified:
    branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py

Modified: branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py
URL: 
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py?rev=19905&r1=19904&r2=19905&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py (original)
+++ branches/relax_disp/target_functions/relax_disp.py Thu Jun  6 19:22:23 
2013
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
                 phi_ex_scaled = phi_ex * self.frqs[spin_index, frq_index]**2
 
                 # Back calculate the R2eff values.
-                r2eff_M61(r1rho_prime=R20[frq_index], phi_ex=phi_ex_scaled, 
kex=kex, spin_lock_fields=self.cpmg_frqs, 
back_calc=self.back_calc[spin_index, frq_index], 
num_points=self.num_disp_points)
+                r2eff_M61(r1rho_prime=R20[frq_index], phi_ex=phi_ex_scaled, 
kex=kex, spin_lock_fields=self.spin_lock_nu1, 
back_calc=self.back_calc[spin_index, frq_index], 
num_points=self.num_disp_points)
 
                 # For all missing data points, set the back-calculated value 
to the measured values so that it has no effect on the chi-squared value.
                 for point_index in range(self.num_disp_points):




Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Thu Jun 06 20:00:02 2013