Author: bugman Date: Fri May 9 09:47:59 2014 New Revision: 23120 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=23120&view=rev Log: Clean ups of the Carver and Richards descriptions. This is for the B14 model (http://wiki.nmr-relax.com/B14) section of the dispersion chapter of the manual. Modified: trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex Modified: trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex?rev=23120&r1=23119&r2=23120&view=diff ============================================================================== --- trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex (original) +++ trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex Fri May 9 09:47:59 2014 @@ -634,7 +634,7 @@ The term $p_D$ is based on product of the off diagonal elements in the CPMG propagator, see supplementary Section 3, \citet{Baldwin2014}. -It is interesting to consider the region of validity of the Carver Richards result. The two results are equal when the correction is zero, which is true when +It is interesting to consider the region of validity of the Carver and Richards result. The two results are equal when the correction is zero, which is true when \begin{equation} \sqrt{v_{1c}^2-1} \approx v_2 + 2k_{\textrm{AB}}p_D . \end{equation} @@ -642,8 +642,8 @@ This occurs when $k_{\textrm{AB}}p_D$ tends to zero, and so $v_2=v_3$. Setting $k_{\textrm{AB}}p_D$ to zero, amounts to neglecting magnetisation that starts on the ground state ensemble and end on the excited state ensemble and vice versa. This will be a good approximation when $p_A \gg p_B$. -In practise, significant deviations from the Carver Richards equation can be incurred if $p_B > 1$\%. -Incorporation of the correction term, results in an improved description of the CPMG experiment over the Carver Richards equation \citet{CarverRichards72}. +In practise, significant deviations from the Carver and Richards equation can be incurred if $p_B > 1$\%. +Incorporation of the correction term, results in an improved description of the CPMG experiment over \citet{CarverRichards72}. The reference for this equation is: \begin{itemize}