Author: tlinnet Date: Thu May 29 12:24:25 2014 New Revision: 23586 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=23586&view=rev Log: Converting back to having back_calc as a function argument to model TAP03. This is to clean up the API. There can be bo no partial measures/implementations in the relax trunk. The problem is, that many numerical models can't be optimised further, since they evolve the spin-magnetisation in a matrix. That spin evolvement can't be put into a larger numpy array. This is related to: task #7793: (https://gna.org/task/?7793) Speed-up of dispersion models. Modified: branches/disp_speed/lib/dispersion/tap03.py branches/disp_speed/target_functions/relax_disp.py branches/disp_speed/test_suite/unit_tests/_lib/_dispersion/test_tap03.py Modified: branches/disp_speed/lib/dispersion/tap03.py URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/disp_speed/lib/dispersion/tap03.py?rev=23586&r1=23585&r2=23586&view=diff ============================================================================== --- branches/disp_speed/lib/dispersion/tap03.py (original) +++ branches/disp_speed/lib/dispersion/tap03.py Thu May 29 12:24:25 2014 @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ from numpy import arctan2, array, isfinite, min, sin, sqrt, sum -def r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=None, omega=None, offset=None, pA=None, pB=None, dw=None, kex=None, R1=0.0, spin_lock_fields=None, spin_lock_fields2=None, num_points=None): +def r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=None, omega=None, offset=None, pA=None, pB=None, dw=None, kex=None, R1=0.0, spin_lock_fields=None, spin_lock_fields2=None, back_calc=None, num_points=None): """Calculate the R1rho' values for the TP02 model. See the module docstring for details. This is the Trott, Abergel and Palmer (2003) equation. @@ -89,7 +89,9 @@ @type spin_lock_fields: numpy rank-1 float array @keyword spin_lock_fields2: The R1rho spin-lock field strengths squared (in rad^2.s^-2). This is for speed. @type spin_lock_fields2: numpy rank-1 float array - @keyword num_points: The number of points on the dispersion curve, equal to the length of the spin_lock_fields. + @keyword back_calc: The array for holding the back calculated R1rho values. Each element corresponds to the combination of offset and spin lock field. + @type back_calc: numpy rank-1 float array + @keyword num_points: The number of points on the dispersion curve, equal to the length of the spin_lock_fields and back_calc arguments. @type num_points: int """ @@ -116,7 +118,8 @@ # Bad gamma. if min(gamma) < 0.0: - return array([1e100]*num_points) + back_calc[:] = array([1e100]*num_points) + return # Special omega values. waeff2 = gamma*spin_lock_fields2 + da**2 # Effective field at A. @@ -136,7 +139,8 @@ # Catch zeros (to avoid pointless mathematical operations). # This will result in no exchange, returning flat lines. if numer == 0.0: - return R1_cos_theta2 + R1rho_prime_sin_theta2 + back_calc[:] = R1_cos_theta2 + R1rho_prime_sin_theta2 + return # Denominator. denom = waeff2*wbeff2/weff2 + kex2 - 2.0*hat_sin_theta2*phi_ex + (1.0 - gamma)*spin_lock_fields2 @@ -149,4 +153,4 @@ if not isfinite(sum(R1rho)): R1rho = array([1e100]*num_points) - return R1rho + back_calc[:] = R1rho Modified: branches/disp_speed/target_functions/relax_disp.py URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/disp_speed/target_functions/relax_disp.py?rev=23586&r1=23585&r2=23586&view=diff ============================================================================== --- branches/disp_speed/target_functions/relax_disp.py (original) +++ branches/disp_speed/target_functions/relax_disp.py Thu May 29 12:24:25 2014 @@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ # Loop over the offsets. for oi in range(self.num_offsets[0][si][mi]): # Back calculate the R1rho values. - self.back_calc[0][si][mi][oi] = r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=R20[r20_index], omega=self.chemical_shifts[0][si][mi], offset=self.offset[0][si][mi][oi], pA=pA, pB=pB, dw=dw_frq, kex=kex, R1=self.r1[si, mi], spin_lock_fields=self.spin_lock_omega1[0][mi][oi], spin_lock_fields2=self.spin_lock_omega1_squared[0][mi][oi], num_points=self.num_disp_points[0][si][mi][oi]) + r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=R20[r20_index], omega=self.chemical_shifts[0][si][mi], offset=self.offset[0][si][mi][oi], pA=pA, pB=pB, dw=dw_frq, kex=kex, R1=self.r1[si, mi], spin_lock_fields=self.spin_lock_omega1[0][mi][oi], spin_lock_fields2=self.spin_lock_omega1_squared[0][mi][oi], back_calc=self.back_calc[0][si][mi][oi], num_points=self.num_disp_points[0][si][mi][oi]) # For all missing data points, set the back-calculated value to the measured values so that it has no effect on the chi-squared value. for di in range(self.num_disp_points[0][si][mi][oi]): Modified: branches/disp_speed/test_suite/unit_tests/_lib/_dispersion/test_tap03.py URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/disp_speed/test_suite/unit_tests/_lib/_dispersion/test_tap03.py?rev=23586&r1=23585&r2=23586&view=diff ============================================================================== --- branches/disp_speed/test_suite/unit_tests/_lib/_dispersion/test_tap03.py (original) +++ branches/disp_speed/test_suite/unit_tests/_lib/_dispersion/test_tap03.py Thu May 29 12:24:25 2014 @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ # Required data structures. self.num_points = 11 + self.R1rho = zeros(self.num_points, float64) def calc_r1rho(self): @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ pB, dw_frq, spin_lock_omega1, spin_lock_omega1_squared = self.param_conversion(pA=self.pA, dw=self.dw, sfrq=self.sfrq, spin_lock_nu1=self.spin_lock_nu1) # Calculate the R1rho values. - R1rho = r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=self.r1rho_prime, omega=self.omega, offset=self.offset, pA=self.pA, pB=pB, dw=dw_frq, kex=self.kex, R1=self.r1, spin_lock_fields=spin_lock_omega1, spin_lock_fields2=spin_lock_omega1_squared, num_points=self.num_points) + r1rho_TAP03(r1rho_prime=self.r1rho_prime, omega=self.omega, offset=self.offset, pA=self.pA, pB=pB, dw=dw_frq, kex=self.kex, R1=self.r1, spin_lock_fields=spin_lock_omega1, spin_lock_fields2=spin_lock_omega1_squared, back_calc=self.R1rho, num_points=self.num_points) # Compare to function value. # Larmor frequency [s^-1]. @@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ # Check all R1rho values. for i in range(self.num_points): - self.assertAlmostEqual(R1rho[i], r1rho_no_rex[i]) + self.assertAlmostEqual(self.R1rho[i], r1rho_no_rex[i]) def param_conversion(self, pA=None, dw=None, sfrq=None, spin_lock_nu1=None):