mailRe: [task #3838] Splitting up and redesigning the 'pdb()' user function.


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Edward d'Auvergne on October 13, 2006 - 16:34:
Diffusion models other than local_tm are not working.  My Traceback is:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "relax", line 458, in ?
    Relax()
  File "relax", line 170, in __init__
    self.interpreter.run()
  File "/local/home/viochem/relax/prompt/interpreter.py",
line 213, in run
    run_script(intro=self.relax.intro_string, local=self.local,
script_file=self.relax.script_file , quit=1)
  File "/local/home/viochem/relax/prompt/interpreter.py",
line 388, in run_script
    console.interact(intro, local, script_file, quit)
  File "/local/home/viochem/relax/prompt/interpreter.py",
line 340, in interact_script
    execfile(script_file, local)
  File "full_analysis-ellipsoid.py", line 437, in ?
    Main()
  File "full_analysis-ellipsoid.py", line 193, in __init__
    pdb(name, self.alex_pdb)
 AttributeError: PDB instance has no __call__ method

This problem is because the PDB user functions are now different between the 1.2 and 1.3 lines. In 1.2 the user function is called 'pdb()'. In 1.3 the user function is now called 'pdb.read()' and 'pdb.vectors()'. The function has been split into 2. This is all discussed in task #3838 (https://gna.org/task/?3838).


I ran the test-suite and also had some failures:

#############################
# Results of the test suite #
#############################

Angle calculation tests:
    The user function angles()
..........................................................
[ Failed ]

    Mapping the {theta, phi, Da} chi2 space through the OpenDX user function
dx.map() ... [ Failed ]

 Synopsis
................................................................................
[ Failed ]


I'll look into these.


I just tried to do a 'svn up' to check my verision number and found:

svn: Malformed network data

Typing svn info I find that I have revision 2641.

I have no idea what happened there. I've never seen that problem before. It could be a network dropout. If you retype 'svn up' do you get the problem?

Edward



Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Fri Oct 13 16:40:21 2006