Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
Hi,
I would actually make the branch from just before r3023 in the 1.3
line. This will avoid the tag specific changes which went into
'tags/1.3.0'.
Cheers,
Edward
Hi Ed or should I say good morning?
what are the tagspecific changes and why would i need to avoid them?
regards
gary
n.b. what should I do snv delete followed by svn cp using a specific
revision and if so what revision would you go for I am not quite
working out how to follow the full set of revisions for the 1.3 line
and where to stop
n.b. 2 This very much a prototype line and my expectations is that it
will never be merged with or that only a few files will be merged and
the rest of the revisions will be forwardported by hand. So as long as
the revision I have grabbed works that shouldn't be a problem?
On 3/15/07, garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Author: varioustoxins
Date: Wed Mar 14 15:55:17 2007
New Revision: 3195
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=3195&view=rev
Log:
branch for initial multi processor programming
Added:
branches/multi_processor/
- copied from r3194, tags/1.3.0/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-commits mailing list
relax-commits@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits
.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Gary Thompson
Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology,
University of Leeds, Astbury Building,
Leeds, LS2 9JT, West-Yorkshire, UK Tel. +44-113-3433024
email: garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fax +44-113-2331407
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: r3195 - /branches/multi_processor/