There is one more place that the name change needs to be reverted.
Please see below.
On Jan 16, 2008 3:04 AM, <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Author: semor
Date: Wed Jan 16 03:04:02 2008
New Revision: 4762
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=4762&view=rev
Log:
Reverted a change so that the 'relax_sim_data' structure is correctly
called.
While making changes for the new design, it had been accidentally changed
to 'relax_sim_spin'.
This was pointed by Edward d'Auvergne in a post at:
https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2008-01/msg00051.html (Message-id:
<7f080ed10801140725l5422b067jcd6c6d050fbb6e77@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
Modified:
branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py
Modified: branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py
URL:
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py?rev=4762&r1=4761&r2=4762&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py
(original)
+++ branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py Wed
Jan 16 03:04:02 2008
@@ -106,21 +106,21 @@
if sim_index == None:
r1 = spin.relax_spin[j]
This structure should be called 'spin.relax_data' rather than
'spin.relax_spin'.
Regards,
Edward
Re: r4762 - /branches/consistency_tests_1.3/specific_fns/consistency_tests.py