mail[bug #11454] Constraint incorrectly supplied when using the "full_analysis.py" script


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Sébastien Morin on April 11, 2008 - 18:23:

Update of bug #11454 (project relax):

                Priority:              5 - Normal => 7 - High               

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #3:

Hi,

I had a look at some "final" run with 500 simulations and found out
something.

The simulations are affected by this break of the minimise() function when
encountering model "m0"...

See, for example, errors for S2 for residues before residue 218 (for which
"m0" was chosen) and after this residue. Before the residue, errors in S2 are
fine, but after they are excessively small...


==============================
...
216  val   1         error     N       m7    ...  0.031361478644779991
217  thr   1         error     N       m7    ...  0.038211292618960502
218  gly   1         error     N       m0    ...  None
219  asn   1         error     N       m1    ...  1.112698441354078e-15
220  leu   1         error     N       m3    ...  3.2268254799268261e-15
...
==============================

If we have a look at some simulations, for example simulations 1, 2 and 3 :

==============================
...
216  val   0         sim_1     N       m7    ...  0.78494175630280139
217  thr   0         sim_1     N       m7    ...  0.82059932724210649
218  gly   0         sim_1     N       m0    ...  None
219  asn   0         sim_1     N       m1    ...  0.9225077650606851
220  leu   0         sim_1     N       m3    ...  0.84861925081698242
...
216  val   1         sim_2     N       m7    ...  0.81063701088779105
217  thr   1         sim_2     N       m7    ...  0.8206973815627201
218  gly   1         sim_2     N       m0    ...  None
219  asn   1         sim_2     N       m1    ...  0.9225077650606851
220  leu   1         sim_2     N       m3    ...  0.84861925081698242
...
216  val   1         sim_3     N       m7    ...  0.83600457272281326
217  thr   1         sim_3     N       m7    ...  0.81752904637249857
218  gly   1         sim_3     N       m0    ...  None
219  asn   1         sim_3     N       m1    ...  0.9225077650606851
220  leu   1         sim_3     N       m3    ...  0.84861925081698242
...
==============================

we see that simulated values vary for residues before 218 (with model "m0"),
but never vary (obviously are not simulated) for residues following this
first instance of model "m0" in the sequence.

This is a serious bug.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?11454>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/




Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Wed Apr 16 21:22:27 2008