Hi Ed,
As you say, it is of low priority. Thus, don't worry about it until you
have time.
Moreover, the fix is fully ported to the 1.3 line (see r6665,
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6665&view=rev)
Regards,
Séb
Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
I think this should be a new release. But as it could be classified
as a low priority, I might leave this for next weekend as it takes
quite a few hours to do a release. Is this fix fully ported to the
1.3 line as well?
Regards,
Edward
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Sébastien Morin
<sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
Consistency testing code changed slightly at revision 6611
(http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=6611&view=rev).
Consistency results are not affected by this change, but the absolute
values of the F_eta function changed (by a factor of sqrt(3)).
Does this change justify a new relax 1.2 release..?
Regards,
Séb :)
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel