On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:03 PM, <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Author: semor
Date: Mon Jan 19 22:03:37 2009
New Revision: 8543
URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=8543&view=rev
Log:
Fixed a typo.
This was sport by Ed in a post at:
https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2009-01/msg00098.html
(Message-id: <7f080ed10901191240v3a289c8fq9553f64c6c3b06be@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
Modified:
branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py
Modified: branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py
URL:
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py?rev=8543&r1=8542&r2=8543&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py (original)
+++ branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py Mon Jan 19 22:03:37 2009
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@
'slow': [R2A, kA, dw].
The equations for these two models are
- / / kex \
4 * cpmg_frq \
+ / / kex \
4 * cpmg_frq \\
The characters '\\' do work but if you use '\ ' instead, with the
space at the very end, then the formulae look good in the code, in the
epydoc documentation (where '\\' may not work), in the help system,
and in the relax manual (again where '\\' may have problems).
Regards,
Edward
Re: r8543 - /branches/relax_disp/prompt/relax_disp.py