Sébastien Morin wrote:
Hi Ed,
I just tried something using the files in the bug report, as well as
with the up-to-date 1.3 repository (r9001)...
I modified line 303 of the script from:
self.model_selection(modsel_pipe='final',
dir=self.base_dir + 'aic')
to:
self.model_selection(modsel_pipe='aic',
dir=self.base_dir + 'aic')
With this change, model 'm8' is eliminated and model 'm1' is selected
instead.
Is it possible that model-free model elimination was not performed
during normal rounds of minimisation (with modsel_pipe='aic') ?
Sorry, correct the sentence above with:
---
Is it possible that model-free model elimination was not performed
during normal rounds of minimisation (with line 303 including the
argument: modsel_pipe='final') ?
---
Séb
I was sure I had tried this change yesterday with Pierre-Yves (on his
full datasets). However, probably something was wrong or maybe the
changes you made today were also needed. Anyway...
What do you think ?
Regards,
Séb :)
Edward d Auvergne wrote:
Update of bug #13259 (project relax):
Status: None => Confirmed
Assigned to: None => bugman
Operating System: GNU/Linux => All systems
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?13259>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
--
Sébastien Morin
PhD Student
S. Gagné NMR Laboratory
Université Laval & PROTEO
Québec, Canada
Re: [bug #13259] full analysis-high Te values