Re: [bug #14182] System tests failures depend on the actual machine -- September 03, 2009 - 11:38

Hi,

I've now written a script so that you can fix this.  Try running:

./relax scripts/optimisation_testing.py > /dev/null

This will give you all the info you need, formatted ready for copying
and pasting into the correct file.  This is currently only
'test_suite/system_tests/model_free.py'.  Just paste the pre-formatted
python comment into the correct test, and add the different values to
the list of values checked.

Cheers,

Edward


2009/9/3 Sébastien Morin <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Ed,
>
> I just checked my original mail
> (https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2009-05/msg00003.html).
>
>
> For the failure "FAIL: Constrained BFGS opt, backtracking line search
> {S2=0.970, te=2048, Rex=0.149}", the counts were initially as follows:
>    f_count   386
>    g_count   386
> and are now:
>    f_count   743   694   761
>    g_count   168   172   164
>
>
> For the failure "FAIL: Constrained BFGS opt, More and Thuente line
> search {S2=0.970, te=2048, Rex=0.149}", the counts were initially as
> follows:
>    f_count   722
>    g_count   164
> and are now:
>    f_count   375   322   385
>    g_count   375   322   385
>
>
> The different values given for the "just-measured" parameters account
> for the 3 different computers I have access to that give rise to these
> two annoying failures...
>
> I wounder if the names of the tests in the original mail were not mixed,
> as numbers just measured in the second test seem closer to those
> originally posted in the first test, and vice versa...
>
> Anyway, the problem is that there are variations between the different
> machines. Variations are also present for the other parameters (s2, te,
> rex, chi2, iter).
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Séb  :)
>
>
>
> Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could you check and see if the numbers are exactly the same as in your
> > original email 
> > (https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2009-05/msg00003.html)?
> >  Specifically look at f_count and g_count.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Edward
> >
> >
> > 2009/9/2 Sébastien Morin <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Hi Ed,
> > >
> > > I updated my svn copies to r9432 and checked if the problem was still
> > > present.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, it is still present...
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > Séb
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Ah, yes, there is a reason.  I went through and fixed a series of
> > > > these optimisation difference issues - in my local svn copy.  I
> > > > collected these all together and committed them as one after I had
> > > > shut the bugs.  This was a few minutes ago at r9426.  If you update
> > > > and test now, it should work.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Edward
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2009/9/2 Sébastien Morin <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Ed,
> > > > >
> > > > > I just tested the for the presence of this bug (1.3 repository, r9425)
> > > > > and it seems it is still there...
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason why it was closed ?
> > > > > From the data I have, I guess this bug report should be re-opened.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe I could try to give more details to help debugging...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Séb  :)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Edward d Auvergne wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Update of bug #14182 (project relax):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >                   Status:               Confirmed => Fixed
> > > > > >              Assigned to:                    None => bugman
> > > > > >              Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     _______________________________________________________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Reply to this item at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   <http://gna.org/bugs/?14182>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > >   Message sent via/by Gna!
> > > > > >   http://gna.org/
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sébastien Morin
> > > > > PhD Student
> > > > > S. Gagné NMR Laboratory
> > > > > Université Laval & PROTEO
> > > > > Québec, Canada
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sébastien Morin
> > > PhD Student
> > > S. Gagné NMR Laboratory
> > > Université Laval & PROTEO
> > > Québec, Canada
>
>
> --
> Sébastien Morin
> PhD Student
> S. Gagné NMR Laboratory
> Université Laval & PROTEO
> Québec, Canada