lousy formulation -- November 19, 2010 - 15:54

lousy formulation

Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>> [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header

To: "relax-devel@xxxxxxx" <relax-devel@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:53:55 +0100
Accept-language: en-US, de-DE
Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Message-id: <C499CEAA2FE47E4F8E5C154780A4767301269353A5@exch8.ads.bruker.de>
Thread-index: AQHLh/kkuIBsQpdTOkKgu/bAy2Uq8Q==
Thread-topic: lousy formulation

Content

Posted by Neidig Klaus-Peter on November 19, 2010 - 15:54:

Dear Edward,

I think I formulated the first sentences of my reply this morning not very 
well. I just wanted to say
that the least squares formula contains the term 1/sigma^2 not that sigma is 
the square error. In fact as
sigma of any peak intensity/integral I use the error of the peak 
intensity/integral. 

Sorry and best regards,
Peter

Related Messages

Powered by MHonArc, Updated Mon Nov 22 19:40:14 2010