Hi Edward, Yes I am sorry about the private label. I set it initially to private because I was going to include the structure of the protein attached, but then I realized that I didn't need to send the whole thing. Eventually I forgot to set the label back to public. So, yes, you can use the info as you wish to try and solve the issue - including the test suite. Hope to hear from you soon. Cheers TP -----Original Message----- From: Edward d'Auvergne [mailto:edward.dauvergne@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: terça-feira, 12 de Abril de 2011 7:51 To: anonymous Cc: Tiago Pais; relax-devel@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [bug #18019] Gridsearch appears not to be working when upper/lower bounds are set Hi, Is there any reason this bug report has been made private? The data is so truncated, there's nothing much anyone can do with it. The privacy tag is usually reserved for security issues whereby it needs to be kept private until a fix is found and released. Then the bug can be made public. I'm looking into this now, but I'm not exactly sure what is happening. Is it ok if I include this data, or part of it, into the relax test suite? This will significantly help in the debugging and will make sure this bug never returns! Cheers, Edward On 11 April 2011 13:42, anonymous <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
URL: <http://gna.org/bugs/?18019> Summary: Gridsearch appears not to be working when upper/lower bounds are set Project: relax Submitted by: None Submitted on: Mon 11 Apr 2011 11:42:49 AM UTC Category: relax's source code Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: None Privacy: Private Assigned to: None Originator Name: Tiago Pais Originator Email: tpais@xxxxxxxxxxx Open/Closed: Open Discussion Lock: Any Release: 1.3.8 Operating System: GNU/Linux _______________________________________________________ Details: My system is Ubuntu-9.04: When I perform a gridsearch, exclusively for m5, with the lower and upper bounds set to: lower=[0.111, 0, -0.0], upper=[0.111, 1.00, 200] I keep
seeing
the following message during the calculations: "Min f: 3474.82 k: 3860 xk: [ 0.111, 0.066667, -0] fk: nan Increment: array([ 5, 16, 16]) Params: array([ 0.111, 1. , Inf]) Min params: array([ 0.111 , 0.06666667, -0. ]) f: nan Min f: 3474.82 k: 3861 xk: [ 0.111, 0.066667, -0] fk: nan Increment: array([ 6, 16, 16]) Params: array([ 0.111, 1. , Inf]) Min params: array([ 0.111 , 0.06666667, -0. ]) f: nan " And at the end the tauS is zero for all spins and the S2s is always close
to
1. Attached follows the script that I am using and a truncated sample of my
data
set (I hope it is not too truncated!) as well as the results that I am getting. If you need more info let me know. Thanks Regards Tiago P _______________________________________________________ File Attachments: ------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon 11 Apr 2011 11:42:49 AM UTC Name: ErrorReportRelax.tar.gz
Size:
8kB By: None <http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=12833> _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?18019> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6034 (20110411) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6034 (20110411) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com