mailRe: [patch #4130] Extended system test for providing list of spectra ID for NMRPipe seriesTab


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Troels Emtekær Linnet on September 02, 2013 - 15:26:
No, not yet. :-)

I would instead have several NMRPipe seriestab files.
Or chose to delete the spectrum after loadning.


Troels Emtekær Linnet


2013/9/2 Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,

For the spectrum.read_intensities user function, the int_col is
currently ignored for the NMRPipe seriesTab format.  But maybe it
could be used.  For example if the user would like to only extract the
data from one column.  So if you set int_col to 10, then data from the
2th data column would be extracted.  And if spectrum_id is set to
'auto', the 'Z_A1' can be used.  Do you see any value in having this
ability?

Regards,

Edward



On 2 September 2013 15:12, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Edward.
>
> So the question if, if it neccessary for the user to supply a 'int_col'
> list, when loading
> a NMRPipe SeriesTab file.
>
> There is a check, which is made for the generic format list, where 'int_col'
> has been designed.
> But it should not apply for NMRPipe SeriesTab. ?
>
> The easiest fix for the user, is just to supply the list.
> But the list is not used for anything yet, and could just create confusion.
>
> Best
> Troels
>
>
>
> Troels Emtekær Linnet
>
>
> 2013/9/2 Edward d Auvergne <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> Follow-up Comment #1, patch #4130 (project relax):
>>
>> This patch does not change the test.  It passes before and after applying
>> the
>> patch.  What is the purpose of this addition?  Why is it part of an
>> existing
>> test and not a new test?  Are you trying to replicate bug #21076
>> (http://gna.org/bugs/?21076)?
>>
>> Note that the patch is missing a newline at the end - there should be 2
>> empty
>> lines between functions/methods.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Reply to this item at:
>>
>>   <http://gna.org/patch/?4130>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>   Message sent via/by Gna!
>>   http://gna.org/
>>
>


Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Mon Sep 02 15:40:05 2013