Hi,
Maybe it would be better to change everything to kA? In the
lib.dispersion code, I even call this parameter k_AB. In the manual,
I have used kAB, where AB are subscripted. So for consistency, I
think we should change everything everywhere! Maybe the best would be
the k_AB parameter in the code? The reverse rate would then be called
k_BA. This would be confused with the kex,B = k_BA + k_AB rate, or kB
~= kex,B, but if kB was used like kA is, then this would be a mess.
What do you think?
Regards,
Edward
On 2 September 2013 15:16, Troels E. Linnet
<NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Follow-up Comment #15, sr #3071 (project relax):
Renamed kA parameter to ka, to keep to already established parameter
naming in
relax.
Patch applied.
(file #18829)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name:
0001-Renamed-kA-parameter-to-ka-to-use-the-same-parameter.patch
Size:9 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/support/?3071>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel