Hi,
First I would recommend updating your code. I have made the ordering
clearer throughout. This is mainly placement problems with the
'DPL94' model, due to the non-functional 'M61B' model. But have left
your 'TSMFK01' model alone in case you were making changes - so it
still needs to be placed in the correct position. The logical order
is more like:
CPMG analytic models by year,
CPMG numeric models by alphabetic ordering,
R1rho analytic models by year,
R1rho numeric models by alphabetic ordering.
Note that the __all__ list in the lib.dispersion module is an
exception - this is alphabetically ordered like in all the __init__.py
files. The target functions in ./target_functions/relax_disp.py also
follow the pure alphabetical ordering as required by the relax
convention for functions/methods/classes, though they have this
ordering in the __init__() method. This allows the functions to be
more easily found by a developer. Another exception is the imports
where alphabetical ordering is used.
Regards,
Edward
On 3 September 2013 13:30, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Edward.
You asked to change the order of model names, after the year.
I guess that you mean to change these files:
gedit ./specific_analyses/relax_disp/variables.py ;
gedit ./user_functions/relax_disp.py ;
gedit ./lib/dispersion/__init__.py ;
gedit ./target_functions/relax_disp.py ;
gedit ./specific_analyses/relax_disp/api.py ;
Is the meaning:
CPMG
- After year
R1rho
- After year
Best
Troels Emtekær Linnet
_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
Re: Changing the order of model names