mail[bug #21665] Running a CPMG analysis with two fields at two delay times


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Troels E. Linnet on February 17, 2014 - 18:10:
URL:
  <http://gna.org/bugs/?21665>

                 Summary: Running a CPMG analysis with two fields at two delay
times
                 Project: relax
            Submitted by: tlinnet
            Submitted on: Mon 17 Feb 2014 05:10:23 PM UTC
                Category: relax sample scripts
Specific analysis category: Relaxation dispersion
                Priority: 5 - Normal
                Severity: 4 - Important
                  Status: In Progress
             Assigned to: None
         Originator Name: 
        Originator Email: 
             Open/Closed: Open
                 Release: 3.1.5
         Discussion Lock: Any
        Operating System: All systems

    _______________________________________________________

Details:

This issue has been discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.science.nmr.relax.devel/5030

A CPMG analysis for a dataset obtained at two fields.
The data is also recorded at two delay times.

The setup looks like this in the GUI.
http://cdn.imghack.se/images/4dc2eadbea2862889374daa148177347.png

Last lines of output from relax
-------------------------------------
relax> relax_disp.select_model(model='R2eff')
R2eff/R1rho value and error determination.

relax> calc(verbosity=1)
RelaxError: The experiment 'SQ CPMG' is not of the fixed relaxation time
period data type.
-------------------------------------

This looks like a problem with the current data checks prior to
executing the auto-analysis.






    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/bugs/?21665>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/




Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Wed Feb 19 14:20:26 2014