mailRe: r25218 - /trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Edward d'Auvergne on August 22, 2014 - 16:15:
Hmmm, I'm now starting to wonder if some of the T_relax values in the
model equations should not be tau_CPMG :S

Regards,

Edward



On 22 August 2014 15:24, Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, because you propagate by the length of the relaxation time
(exponentially) and then multiply the log of this by inv_relax_time at
the end, they should cancel.  So my opinion in these numeric models is
that as long as the relaxation time is not zero or does not cause the
magnitisation vector to go to zero (i.e. the time is too too big),
then absolutely any random time could be used.  I just randomly picked
2 here as that would still result in a reasonable number.  But you
could try setting the relaxation time to a fixed value of 0.1, and I
would assume that R2eff values will be correctly predicted.  If not,
then there might be a bug somewhere in
lib/dispersion/ns_r1rho_2site.py.

Regards,

Edward



On 22 August 2014 15:14, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
Ehh.

Say again?

Why 2.0 ?

2014-08-22 15:01 GMT+02:00 Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Troels,

For sanity reasons, what happens if you divide the maximum relax_time
by 2.0?  Do you see exactly the same result as would be expected?

Regards,

Edward


On 22 August 2014 14:53,  <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Author: tlinnet
Date: Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014
New Revision: 25218

URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=25218&view=rev
Log:
Fix for time not extracted for CPMG experiments in target_function-

bug #22461(https://gna.org/bugs/?22461): NS R1rho 2-site_fit_r1 has 
extremely high chi2 value in systemtest 
Relax_disp.test_r1rho_kjaergaard_missing_r1.

Modified:
    trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py

Modified: trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py
URL: 
http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py?rev=25218&r1=25217&r2=25218&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py        (original)
+++ trunk/target_functions/relax_disp.py        Fri Aug 22 14:53:25 2014
@@ -325,6 +325,8 @@
                                 cpmg_frq = cpmg_frqs[ei][mi][oi][di]

                                 # Missing data for an entire field 
strength.
+                                relax_time = 
max(relax_times[ei][mi][oi][di])
+
                                 if isNaN(relax_time):
                                     power = 0



_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-commits mailing list
relax-commits@xxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-commits

_______________________________________________
relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com)

This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel



Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Fri Aug 22 16:40:22 2014