Update of bug #22552 (project relax): Priority: 9 - Immediate => 5 - Normal Severity: 4 - Important => 2 - Minor _______________________________________________________ Follow-up Comment #1: Corrections to this statement. The C-code was not initialized with function values. Therefore a return with 0.0 from target_functions.relax_fit import jacobian, jacobian_chi2, setup from specific_analyses.relax_fit.optimisation import func_wrapper, dfunc_wrapper, d2func_wrapper func = func_wrapper times = array([ 0.7, 1. , 0.8, 0.4, 0.9]) I = array([ 476.76174875, 372.43328777, 454.20339981, 656.87936253, 419.16726341]) errors = array([ 9.48032653, 11.34093541, 9.35149017, 10.84867928, 12.17590736]) scaling_list = [1.0, 1.0] setup(num_params=2, num_times=len(times), values=I, sd=errors, relax_times=times, scaling_matrix=scaling_list) R = - 500. I0 = 1000. params = [R, I0] chi2 = func(params) The question is, if minfx can handle inf values? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/bugs/?22552> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/