Re: r27840 - /trunk/auto_analyses/relax_disp_repeat_cpmg.py -- June 08, 2015 - 18:35

On 8 June 2015 at 16:28, Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Troels,
>
> I'm not sure what this means yet, but I think this would be better
> stored in the status object.  It could be a run time command line
> option --mp_verbosity which can be true or false, or set in a
> different way.  The reason is because the multi-processor framework is
> not only for minimisation.  It could be used for anything that can be
> run on a cluster.  Think of dx.map, dasha.execute, palmer.execute,
> structure.sequence_alignment, structure.superimpose, a grid search, or
> a new analysis parallised at a much higher level.  I think it would be
> good to discuss this.

Hi,

Actually, maybe this would be better activated with the debug flag?
The other multi-processor printouts are activated in this way, as this
is mainly used for debugging purposes.  That would simplify all the
interfaces.

Regards,

Edward