Dear Maddy,
Welcome to the relax mailing lists. The problem you are seeing
appears to be a version mismatch between relax and minfx, though I
cannot understand why. If you would like to try, relax version 1.3.5
was released a few days ago
(http://gna.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=2205). This version has
minfx bundled with it, so there should be no version mismatch issues.
Note that the full_analysis.py script has been highly modified and
improved, so I would recommend using the newer version of the script.
You can download the appropriate distribution package from
http://www.nmr-relax.com/download.html.
Regards,
Edward
On 14 June 2010 10:40, M Strickland <M.Strickland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have recently started using the full_analysis.py script for my data at
600 and 900 MHz. I had no trouble with the local_tm calculation, but
when I went onto 'sphere' I think I encountered a problem with minfx. I'm
using Python 2.6.5, Minfx 1.0.2 and Relax 1.3.4. I've attached the log of
what happens when I run the full analysis script. It appears to be a
minfx problem, but I can't work out what. Any ideas?
Maddy Strickland
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-users mailing list
relax-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-users
Re: Minfx and Relax