Author: bugman Date: Tue Feb 25 18:39:33 2014 New Revision: 22318 URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax?rev=22318&view=rev Log: Some edits for the tutorial on using the dispersion GUI analysis. The results of the relax_disp.insignificance user function are now shown to demonstrate what this does. Modified: trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex Modified: trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex?rev=22318&r1=22317&r2=22318&view=diff ============================================================================== --- trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex (original) +++ trunk/docs/latex/dispersion.tex Tue Feb 25 18:39:33 2014 @@ -3140,7 +3140,6 @@ Firstly, to see which models have been chosen for the spin systems and which have no statistically significant dispersion, find the \file{model.out} file and double click on it. You should see the following: - \begin{lstlisting}[basicstyle=\ttfamily \scriptsize,numbers=none] # Parameter description: The dispersion model. # @@ -3224,6 +3223,43 @@ The differences between the `CR72' analytic model and the `NS CPMG 2-site expanded' numeric model are insignificant. To see this, open the \file{CR72\ossep{}chi2.agr} and \file{NS CPMG 2-site expanded\ossep{}chi2.agr} Grace files in the \directory{$\sim$\ossep{}dispersion\ossep{}log\osus{}non\osus{}clustered} directory in a text editor and compare the optimised chi-squared values. +To see which spins have been assigned the model `No Rex' due to the $\Rtwoeff/\Ronerho$ insignificance level of 1.0 rad/s, search the log messages for `insignificance'. +You should see: +\begin{lstlisting}[basicstyle=\ttfamily \tiny,language=relax_log,numbers=none] +relax> relax_disp.insignificance(level=1.0) +Deselecting spin ':2@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.772528040762 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':3@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.572686080104 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':4@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.20753288407 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':7@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.184120905625 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':10@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.746360942576 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':11@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.372702361421 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':13@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.261522940719 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':15@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.743965404051 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':16@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.198783344901 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':17@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.469568638477 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':18@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.720840385548 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':19@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.290773963568 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':20@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.983669594767 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':22@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.507488886605 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':24@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.984086643389 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':25@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.638104572082 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':29@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.525261970487 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':33@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.822112754666 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':35@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.713976877685 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':36@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.413602640091 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':37@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.302953864843 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':40@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.401535026435 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':41@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.805657060225 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':43@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.582523964429 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':44@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.325638582443 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':45@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.947956877688 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':49@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.872396631779 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':50@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.403543891199 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':56@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.468272490195 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':57@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.634215047495 rad/s. +Deselecting spin ':58@N', the maximum dispersion curve difference for all curves is 0.953109267554 rad/s. +\end{lstlisting} + To see the optimised parameter values, double click on the \file{kex.agr} file to see the exchange rates. This will open the \uf{grace\ufsep{}view} user function window by which the file can be opened. The default settings produces the following graph: @@ -3295,7 +3331,6 @@ For the clustered analysis, we will focus on one group of spins -- those from residues 59 to 67. These can be seen to have very similar dynamics: - \begin{lstlisting}[basicstyle=\ttfamily \scriptsize,numbers=none] # Parameter description: The population for state A. # @@ -3379,7 +3414,6 @@ Start the analysis by clicking on the \guibutton{Execute} button. You should notice that the spin cluster printout in the log messages in the relax controller window now show the text: - \begin{lstlisting}[numbers=none] The spin cluster [':59', ':60', ':61', ':62', ':63', ':64', ':65', ':66', ':67']. \end{lstlisting} @@ -3496,5 +3530,6 @@ \end{center} As the Akaike Information Criterion value is much less for the non-clustered analysis, then this result is the most parsimonious (the closest to Occam's razor as defined in frequentist statistics). -Therefore the non-clustered analysis is a statistically better description of the experimental data. +Therefore the non-clustered analysis is a statistically better description of the experimental data for this set of residues. +For a different spin cluster, this result might be different. If the assumptions of the same dynamics for all spins (both populations $\pA$ and exchange rates $\kex$) is correct, the results of the clustered analysis are nevertheless useful as it can decrease parameter uncertainty.