On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Sébastien Morin <sebastien.morin.1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ed, I am not sure I understand all what you say here... Am I right if I say that you propose to return the spin_id directly from the intensity_*() functions ? This would simplify the code. Perfect.
That's what I meant.
What about not doing so for the intensity_generic function also ? What difference would this make ? This is where I don't follow what you say... That function is not already returning the spin_id, right ?
Ah, the intensity_generic() function also needs to do this! But it should generate it differently - directly from the generic peak intensity file. Hope that clears things up. Regards, Edward