Hi Michael, This naming is correct. I would like this to be called 'local_tm_model', as the names 'local_tm*' have been used consistently since 2003. The typo is actually in the new status.py module. I will fix this and commit the change in the 1.3 line. Cheers, Edward On 12 April 2010 03:27, Michael Bieri <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Follow-up Comment #44, task #6847 (project relax): Hi Edward There is a typing mistake in dauvergne_protocol.py by assinging the local tm models. Here the patch: -------------------------- Status for local tm models is correctly assigned in dauvergne_protocol.py. ----------------------------- Unfortunately, I committed it in the GUI line. SHould I reverse it? The patch file is attached. Cheers (file #8920) _______________________________________________________ Additional Item Attachment: File name: patch Size:0 KB _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://gna.org/task/?6847> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ _______________________________________________ relax (http://nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel