Hi Michael,
This naming is correct. I would like this to be called
'local_tm_model', as the names 'local_tm*' have been used consistently
since 2003. The typo is actually in the new status.py module. I will
fix this and commit the change in the 1.3 line.
Cheers,
Edward
On 12 April 2010 03:27, Michael Bieri <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Follow-up Comment #44, task #6847 (project relax):
Hi Edward
There is a typing mistake in dauvergne_protocol.py by assinging the local tm
models.
Here the patch:
--------------------------
Status for local tm models is correctly assigned in dauvergne_protocol.py.
-----------------------------
Unfortunately, I committed it in the GUI line. SHould I reverse it?
The patch file is attached.
Cheers
(file #8920)
_______________________________________________________
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: patch Size:0 KB
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/task/?6847>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel