Re: CST branch -- September 06, 2010

Re: CST branch

To: Pavel Kaderavek <pavel.kaderavek@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 13:23:42 +0200

Cc: relax-devel@xxxxxxx

Message-id: <AANLkTinxUWLu2N19dc3eaPgh22igv_SGy=6qmVnJN=Qj@mail.gmail.com>

References: <p2l6052a51004080823g94a64268lf8af8d3e332c2a03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <j2i7f080ed11004120000r80bba9bch9556be67b0c1707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <g2v6052a51004131048sb5c01509sfc9a77045ad33310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <r2g7f080ed11004131113mb209905eh63ff1eb61c171fee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <l2q6052a51004301221h9ad09886ha016465129beb516@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <g2m7f080ed11005050153y2ad8b4bfjb4eb8191b0efd0cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTin4nzkkOCxs94vUKCpT00R7ak22gLaL5rK-VjPN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinF4yNXoJQS-rd81VBi3keRURUNeb-_GdkxqqsG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTinibyBQvsoG1-0vmzOXFmRJxD95VMF3eGxzSMMB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimFT0-Kbgdz_U5LeOW5Ln22mPBZBC8FL68n6CeF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikhknBoHTc7B7GCRULkrEnxSx+PpqPP=x6KrDOH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTim0B-E6kMW9Nn47o+u+atxrm38540u1Xhaoe6j0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=m5S08Nd1F5VDnMGTOu2s+j2Euz1t-ytw0zOAf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Posted by Edward d'Auvergne on September 06, 2010 - 13:24:

Hi Pavel,

Sorry for the delayed response.  I was at the ICMRBS conference in
Australia and then travelled through the tropical north end of
Australia afterwards.  I came back yesterday out of the remote
wilderness and can soon start looking at this patches.

Regards,

Edward


On 31 August 2010 18:00, Pavel Kaderavek <pavel.kaderavek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

some time ago, we submitted two patches regarding CST branch. We are not
sure if we should wait for some additional comment from your side, or we can
continue with introducing further changes in the code.
Next step would be a splitting of the relaxation equation so that
contribution to the relaxation due to the individual types of interaction
(dipole-dipole, CSA) can be calculated separately.


Regars,

Pavel, Petr

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CST branch
  - From: Edward d'Auvergne

Re: CST branch

Header

Content

Related Messages