Re: CST branch -- September 10, 2010 - 15:37

Hi,

I've carefully checked the patches and committed them with the
messages you wrote.  Sorry again for the delays.  It should be faster
now that I am no longer in the tropical wilderness of far north
Australia.

Regards,

Edward


On 6 September 2010 13:23, Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response.  I was at the ICMRBS conference in
> Australia and then travelled through the tropical north end of
> Australia afterwards.  I came back yesterday out of the remote
> wilderness and can soon start looking at this patches.
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
> On 31 August 2010 18:00, Pavel Kaderavek <pavel.kaderavek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some time ago, we submitted two patches regarding CST branch. We are not
> > sure if we should wait for some additional comment from your side, or we 
> > can
> > continue with introducing further changes in the code.
> > Next step would be a splitting of the relaxation equation so that
> > contribution to the relaxation due to the individual types of interaction
> > (dipole-dipole, CSA) can be calculated separately.
> >
> >
> > Regars,
> >
> > Pavel, Petr