Dear Edward. There is two things I would like to add as well. * Grace graphs production for R1rho analysis with R2_eff as function of Omega_eff https://gna.org/support/index.php?3124 * Support request for replacing space in header files for the value.write functions https://gna.org/support/?3121 These are not essential to implement, but are wishes at the current stage. The last support is quite a small wish. But the former would be a quite an improvement for faster understanding of the output from an R1rho analysis. But it is still a wish. Best Troels 2014-02-28 9:28 GMT+01:00 Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Troels, Awesome work with the fixing of the dispersion analysis for different data combinations! With all the new system and units tests that you added, relaxation dispersion in relax will now be much more robust. The more test coverage we have, the stronger the code will. I now think that relax will handle all data combinations that a user throws at it. Well, there is one exception where relax will fail catastrophically - that is if a mixture of fixed time experiments and exponential curves are used. But this and other cases can be handled when a user complains on the mailing list. Now that all the relevant bug reports are closed, I will look at releasing relax 3.1.6 with the fixes and the dispersion GUI tutorial. Was there anything else you were planing on committing to the repository before I tag the release? Cheers, Edward _______________________________________________ relax (http://www.nmr-relax.com) This is the relax-devel mailing list relax-devel@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, visit the list information page at https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel