On Wed, 2006-09-13 at 21:42 +1000, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
Chris,
I've added the comments to the RelaxWarnings as well as to a few
additional RelaxError classes. The RelaxWarning comments were
discussed in the parent post
(https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2006-08/msg00082.html,
Message-id: <7f080ed10608292250u3bc0a0b0ud7a319e05ee70f28@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>)
and your post at
https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-devel/2006-08/msg00083.html
(Message-id: <1156930961.28764.881.camel@fbsdpcu021>). I've also made
a few other cosmetic changes. The full details are given in the
message sent to the relax-commits mailing list located at
https://mail.gna.org/public/relax-commits/2006-09/msg00018.html
(Message-id: <E1GNSEC-0004bj-DY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>). Btw, all the
links to the relax related web pages are to help with the indexing by
Google and other search engines. It appears to be working nicely.
The message-ids have been added to enable the post to be precisely
identified in archived email messages.
The code in the 'warning' branch is very close to being in a state to
merge. But before that happens I have a question about the format
function. In the current code the function is duplicated, once
defined as a method of the 'error.py' module, the other as a function
of the RelaxWarning system class 'RelaxWarnings'. From my reading of
the code, I can only see a need for the function within the
RelaxWarnings class. This is the function which is called by the line
'warnings.formatwarning = self.format'. Is there a reason for the
second copy?
Sorry, the additional copy of the function is a vestige of some
experimentation I was doing. It should never have made it into the
repository. You are right - it is only required as a method of the
RelaxWarnings class.
Chris
Re: RelaxError and RelaxWarning comments and the duplicated format function.