mailRe: unit tests vs... the current test_suite


Others Months | Index by Date | Thread Index
>>   [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Header


Content

Posted by Edward d'Auvergne on October 31, 2006 - 16:21:
On 10/31/06, Gary S. Thompson <garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Two comments

1. we need to be able to run the unittests woithou the gui sometimes ;-)
(I tend to view qa lot of gui stuff for calculations as 'sugar' command
lines are often quicker easier and more informative)

Good point. The test-suite GUI could be an optional and future feature. Then again, it could be incorporated into the Qt GUI if that code ever takes off.


2. I think the unit_test folder will need to be a mirror of the relax
source tree otherwise there will be name space clashes...

Could the files be named something like 'test_specific_fns_model_free.py'? That would avoid many directories. I'm not worried about complexity with the test suite though - if it's a (partial) mirror of the normal tree, then it should be pretty simple to work out.

Edward



Related Messages


Powered by MHonArc, Updated Tue Oct 31 16:41:23 2006