Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
On 10/31/06, Gary S. Thompson <garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Two comments
1. we need to be able to run the unittests woithou the gui sometimes ;-)
(I tend to view qa lot of gui stuff for calculations as 'sugar' command
lines are often quicker easier and more informative)
Good point. The test-suite GUI could be an optional and future
feature. Then again, it could be incorporated into the Qt GUI if that
code ever takes off.
2. I think the unit_test folder will need to be a mirror of the relax
source tree otherwise there will be name space clashes...
Could the files be named something like
'test_specific_fns_model_free.py'? That would avoid many directories.
I'm not worried about complexity with the test suite though - if it's
a (partial) mirror of the normal tree, then it should be pretty simple
to work out.
A more contentius statement is that it should be a mirror orf the normal
tree, most files should have test cases.... ;-)
Edward
.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Gary Thompson
Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology,
University of Leeds, Astbury Building,
Leeds, LS2 9JT, West-Yorkshire, UK Tel. +44-113-3433024
email: garyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fax +44-113-2331407
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: unit tests vs... the current test_suite