Re: [bug #12499] DIFF_MODEL = 'prolate' optimization failure -- October 25, 2008 - 01:06

Interesting (as well as your analysis in the previous messages). All my values
and errors (NOE, R1 and R2) are consistent between 2 software packages, but I
might want to consider alternative error sampling if the end results are
suspicious. Anyways, something tells me there's still going to be a few more
kinks to work out before I get my first parameter data table :p

I'll update the minfx build and start the calculations up again.

Thanks a lot,

Tyler



Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Right, I've fixed the bug in the minfx repository.  It will take me a
> while to release minfx 1.0.2 but using subversion you can get the
> changes immediately.  Note that as this space is so warped,
> optimisation of this model will take a long, long time!
>
> Regards,
>
> Edward
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Edward d Auvergne
> <NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Update of bug #12499 (project relax):
> >
> >                  Status:               Confirmed => Fixed
> >             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed
> >
> >    _______________________________________________________
> >
> > Follow-up Comment #5:
> >
> > This problem has been fixed in the minfx project
> > (https://gna.org/projects/minfx/), in the bug report
> > https://gna.org/bugs/?12501.
> >
> >    _______________________________________________________
> >
> > Reply to this item at:
> >
> >  <http://gna.org/bugs/?12499>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >  Message sent via/by Gna!
> >  http://gna.org/