Hi,
You'll need to update using:
$ svn up
then install as root/administrator by typing (assuming python is
installed as root):
$ python setup.py install
in the minfx base directory. Then the crash shouldn't happen. If it
does still have problems, it would be worth reporting it to the minfx
mailing lists (https://gna.org/mail/?group=minfx). A bug report for
minfx can be submitted at
https://gna.org/bugs/?func=additem&group=minfx.
As for this taking a long time to optimise, that is because of the
convoluted, very tight optimisation space. You can decrease the
max_iter value from 1e7 in the minimise() user function at the start
to to maybe 1e5, but this should not be done at the end of the
analysis. I would say though that all these problems will go away
with a better error analysis in the R2 curve-fitting.
Regards,
Edward
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Tyler Reddy <TREDDY@xxxxxx> wrote:
I used subversion to update minfx, but I'm still having the problem
(unless I
need to delete the old minfx, or does the nested update automatically 'take
over' in this case?).
The calculation certainly goes a lot longer now than it did before, but
at k=312
it crashes out with the same traceback. Another possibility is that
I have to
delete all the local_tm and sphere folders and just start from scratch
with the
new minfx, though I'm not sure that makes sense.
Tyler
Quoting Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Right, I've fixed the bug in the minfx repository. It will take me a
while to release minfx 1.0.2 but using subversion you can get the
changes immediately. Note that as this space is so warped,
optimisation of this model will take a long, long time!
Regards,
Edward
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Edward d Auvergne
<NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Update of bug #12499 (project relax):
Status: Confirmed => Fixed
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #5:
This problem has been fixed in the minfx project
(https://gna.org/projects/minfx/), in the bug report
https://gna.org/bugs/?12501.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?12499>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
_______________________________________________
relax (http://nmr-relax.com)
This is the relax-devel mailing list
relax-devel@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, get a password
reminder, or change your subscription options,
visit the list information page at
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/relax-devel
Re: [bug #12499] DIFF_MODEL = 'prolate' optimization failure