Hi,
Ok, I'll leave the branch there for now, but keep it updated and see
how things progress. It would be a pity for others in the RNA field
interested in using these advances to not have it in the 1.3 versions
where RNA molecules are much better supported.
Cheers,
Edward
On 19 February 2010 12:00, Pavel Kaderavek <kada@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Edward,
you are right, we were quite busy. We decided to make a following
suggestion. We would ask you for some additional time - let's say two
months. I hope we will overcome the current rush until then and we will
start working on the CST branch. If we will be not able to start until that
time (two months from now), we have to admit that we don't have enough time
and skills to do that.
Thank you for your patience
Best
Pavel
On 18 February 2010 18:52, Edward d'Auvergne <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Petr and Pavel,
As the CST branch has been untouched since I first created it, this is
a warning that it will soon be deleted. This is the branch from the
1.3 line (http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/cst/), not the
branch from relax-1.2.10 in which your CS tensor and multi-dipole code
will be permanently archived
(http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/relax/branches/cst_1.2.10/). The branch
from the 1.3 line is a maintenance burden and it does not appear that
your code will be ported to the current relax versions. I will also
close the task for this project (https://gna.org/task/?6397) unless
there is some movement in this space.
Regards,
Edward
Re: Warning - inactivity in the CST branch and deletion.