Hi Edward,
Getting a system into these different models is certainly a good idea.
Could you please explain the naming convention?
NS is numerical solution, expanded is Nikolai's Maple derivation, I
guess full means that both states are detected; but what is the
rationale for "star"? You want to refer to the complex numbers? What
about "2D" in this case?
paul
On 30.08.13 09:30, Edward d'Auvergne wrote:
Hello,
I have the following proposal for renaming the numeric dispersion
models in relax. The reason for this is because I am adding the R1rho
numeric model from the Skrynikov & Tollinger code (the
sim_all.tar file https://gna.org/support/download.php?file_id=18404
attached to https://gna.org/task/?7712#comment5). So I propose the
model names:
'NS CPMG 2-site 3D',
'NS CPMG 2-site 3D full',
'NS CPMG 2-site star',
'NS CPMG 2-site star full',
'NS CPMG 2-site expanded'.
The new model will be:
'NS R1rho 2-site'.
This R1rho model name will change in the future as more numeric R1rho
dispersion models are added.
Regards,
Edward
--
Paul Schanda, Ph.D.
Biomolecular NMR group
Institut de Biologie Structurale Jean-Pierre Ebel (IBS)
41, rue Jules Horowitz
F-38027 Grenoble
France
+33 438 78 95 55
paul.schanda@xxxxxx
http://www.ibs.fr/groups/biomolecular-nmr-spectroscopy?lang=en
Re: Renaming of the numeric dispersion models.