Re: [task #7807] Speed-up of dispersion models for Clustered analysis -- June 18, 2014

Hi,

I'll look into it, it should only take me a few minutes to script up.
I can copy the disp_spin_speed branch scripts directly into the trunk,
and they run if I remove the *_orig arguments to the r2eff_*()
functions.  The reason I asked if you had more plans for the profiling
scripts is because you only have the B14, CR72, DPL94, and TSMFK01
models covered.

Regards,

Edward


On 17 June 2014 23:39, Troels Emtekær Linnet <tlinnet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Edward.

This does indeed sound very good. It would weight much for me, to know how
much my effort have paid off. But I can't allocate more time for anything
strictly needed.

Best
Troels

On 17 Jun 2014 22:55, "Edward d'Auvergne" <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Not quite yet ;)  I have to merge this back to trunk.  But first I need to
see if there is anything to clean up (whitespace, comments, formatting,
naming consistency, API consistency, etc.).  And then this needs to be
released to all relax users, either as relax 3.2.3, or as 3.2.4 with 3.2.3
being reserved for all other trunk changes.

For presenting this, I was thinking of a timing table from you profiling
scripts.  Do you intend on creating a few more?  Maybe for a numeric model
were I think there are speed ups, though no where near what you are seeing
for the analytic models.  I was thinking of witing one master script that
runs all your profiling scripts, one after the other, then repeating this 
10
times.  The log would be captured by the script, and then there will be
timing statistics for each (grepping just for the func_*() target functions
for a single number to use), so that an average and standard deviation can
be presented for relax 3.2.2 vs. the new code.  Then in the release 
message,
it would look like:

Speed comparison for relax-3.2.2 vs. relax-3.2.3:

Single spin analysis:
CR72:  3.2+/-0.3 s vs. 2.8+/-0.2 s -> 1.14x faster
LM63: ...

Cluster of 100 spins:
CR72:  53.5+/-2.4 s vs. 3.6+/-0.2 s -> 14.9x faster

This would be a great way to strongly present these insane speed ups.
What do you think?

Regards,

Edward



On Tuesday, 17 June 2014, Troels E. Linnet
<NO-REPLY.INVALID-ADDRESS@xxxxxxx> wrote:


Update of task #7807 (project relax):

        Percent Complete:                      0% => 100%
             Open/Closed:                    Open => Closed
                  Effort:                    0.00 => 100

    _______________________________________________________

Follow-up Comment #263:

This now complete.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://gna.org/task/?7807>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/

Re: [task #7807] Speed-up of dispersion models for Clustered analysis

Header

Content

Related Messages